Obama and the Birth Certificate Cover UP

There probably is a birth certificate that is locked away from public and prying eyes.
I have no doubt that there is a birth certificate.

The big question is what does it say, how was it obtained, and does it prove that Obama is NOT a natural born citizen of the United States of America.

Just recently my husband needed a new badge from work, no big deal. But, you had to know that there was a catch, he was required, because of homeland security laws, to provide his LONG form birth certificate.

If we as citizens have to provide our long form birth certificate to prove that we are natural born citizens, then I think that elected government officials should be required to do the same.

Reporters from the news sight World Net Daily, an online news publication, have uncovered four ways a person could get a birth certificate in Hawaii during the year 1961. Some of them didn't require but an adult saying he was born here, no witnesses, no doctors, no midwife needed to verify it. And if, this is the kind of birth certificate that Obama has, it could very well prove his status as a natural born citizen is nothing more than a lie.

The fact that a person could make a claim that they had a child born in 1961 without even as much as an appearance 'could' have led to many people filing for false birth certificates. It was done by mail. An option given to people known as BC2

Even today the standards for a Hawaii Birth Certificate are fairly lenient. A Hawaii Drivers license, as well as a prenatal statement from a doctor, and a post natal statement saying the baby had been examined.

While State Officials claim not to give out birth certificates to everyone who applies for one, and that standards are met, there have been alternative methods, through investigation, that show a person can get a 'valid' birth certificate via other means and scenarios.

When I am required to give out my long form birth certificate, or my husband is, to prove my U.S status, with the government allow me to say I've locked it away take my word for face value?

I don't think so.

I don't see Obama's health care costing less

I read a news article headline, I think on Yahoo, now I can't find it that stated that the health care bill will cost Americans less.........

Will it really?

Maybe out of pocket? Sure, how much more in taxes will we have to pay, or do they forget the damn funding has to come from somewhere?

Oh I forgot they'll just take it out of some other budget and bankrupt that just like the government did social security.

Right, I want the government to tell me who I can see, when I can see them, and then on top of it all have access to my medical records?

Not just no

HE-- F---ing NO

I'd rather die than that happen, and at the rate the Barry Boy is going, that will probably happen.

His disgusting 'counseling' clause makes me want to puke, alternative methods to die.

So why doesn't he just say I support Kavorkian and assisted suicide!!!!! Wait he back tracked his vote on Terri Schiavo, and said given the chance he wouldn't have voted to spare her and wanted to end her life now.

This man has no respect for life, as I see it, that's my opinion. He supports abortion, claims its every Americans moral responsibility to fund abortions, more tax dollars hard at work NOT.

Thinks senior citizens should be given counseling on alternative ways to die.

Why am I not so proud to be an American anymore?

Our freedoms are slowly being stripped from us one by one. And this government health care will just be another step towards what will very likely become a one world government.

Barry has already proven he'll stop at nothing, and stoop to whatever illegal tactics he has to, to get what he wants.....why should I expect anything different with his health care proposal.

So how much will our taxes INCREASE because of his little pet health care bill?

Food Network got it wrong

I know all of these shows are taped in the winter time, and air a couple months after completion, but I'm watching some serious blunders on The Next Food Network Star season 5.

I've watched almost every show, and feel I know the contestants well, we know they can cook they would NOT be in the top 5 if they couldn't cook, it comes down to other issues outside of cooking.

Lets recap last night's show.

The bottom two 'finalists'

Debbie
Michael

Michael has admitted that he is afraid of the cameras, but it seems that the Food Network does not want to take the time to coach him to get him more camera friendly, this seems to me to be an out for his openly being a homosexual. I've seen worse people in front of the camera on Food Network, and they have taken the time to coach and work with them.

Which brings me to Debbie, who repeatedly says "I'm Korean", she can cook, we all know she can cook, she's proven that, but what is more important is that her honesty and integrity are non-existent.

I have quit watching shows because I feel they lack the integrity, especially competitions like this, its one reason I won't watch Top Chef anymore, the honesty and integrity just aren't there.

Food Network set a precedent with Jag, followed by Robert Irvine, followed by contestants from this season, Eddie Gilbert, and Teddy Folkman. Eddie was using Food Network Star's own recipes on the show when he should have been coming up with more of his own. Teddy had some of the same issues as Debbie with honesty, and trying to rewrite the days events, he went a week later, but now that brings us to Debbie, who seems to have a history of sabotaging her team mates, this wasn't an individual challenge they had last night, she claimed to have catering expertise, Jeffery put her in charge of expediting, and she did nothing. She left the work to Melissa and Jamika to put out NINE appetizers, while she putzed around and thought of nothing but herself. What made it worse was she tried to take credit for the success of the other 9 appetizers getting done when she had nothing ot do with it, keep in mind the events were recorded. If you think back to the first episode of this season the cake fiasco was on her, she was teh one who bought store bought angel food cake, glopped some preserves on top and then some whipped cream, and they had the audacity to cut someone who made a simple fresh green bean dish. Her integrity went out the window right then and there, and she proved she was in it for her and in it to win.
Bob Tuschman's blog stated he wanted Debbie to go Home, Susie wanted Debbie to go home, and it was Bobby Flay and Ted Allan that wanted her to stay because her dishes were exceptional....put the blinders on guys because that's all you want to see, is that the dishes were good, her attitude, non team player didn't fase them in the least.

Here's where I'm going to throw in my serious opinion. I think Food Network had predetermined from the start who was going to win. They have more than once said they need someone representing the Far East Cuisine.

But, is Debbie the one to do it? Personally I don't think so. She's a natural in front of the camera, but based on integrity issues, I won't watch her. The whole scenario makes me wonder if she isn't going to win because they are afraid if she loses she will file a law suit against them for discrimination. And if that is the case its really sad what America has come to because you can't choose someone based on talent and integrity you have to think every possible scenario, good and bad.

If anyone but Debbie is cut next week, I have to say that I will not watch the remainder of the show because it will give more credibility to the show is 'fixed', and not talent based.

So until next week
Mooch

Why are people so quick to worship Michael Jackson but still Judge OJ Simpson?

I got to thinking last night...............

What defines someone as great? What makes a person a legend?

OJ Simpson in his own way was, note the word was--I didn't say 'is', a sports great, he did things that people didn't think he would ever do but then came the fateful day that his Nichole and Ron were murdered. He would face a double murder trial which he was acquitted of, yet to this day people still judge him and say he got away with double murder, to this day the speculations are there, even if he was acquitted.

Now look at Michael Jackson, he had talent, but he made a lot of critical mistakes with his actions, publicly. He faced child molestation charges, he too, was acquitted, but yet everyone says that his acquittal means he's innocent.

An acquittal doesn't mean innocent, it might mean innocent, OJ was circumstantial evidence, and there was no surefire way to link him to the crime. Remember the famous words, The glove doesn't fit, you must acquit?

Again with Michael Jackson, there was no real proof, he was found 'not guilty' on all charges, I often times wonder if the jury was tainted or paid off. From some of the comments I read and heard about in the news.......but an acquittal doesn't mean he wasn't guilty, it just means the defense gave enough reason to acquit him, that there wasn't enough proof.

I read an article about a journalist who spent time with Michael Jackson and with people in his tight inner circle, and he said Michael Jackson just didn't see anything wrong with sleeping with younger men....even though the rest of the world saw it, he was very 'child like' from what I read.

So what if he chose to live an alternative lifestyle, that isn't even my concern.

Many people look at his actions, how he portrayed himself in public and they don't see the same person that people are literally idolizing. They see someone who dangled a baby over a balcony, they see someone who 'MAY' have molested children in his own home, and that right there alone outweighs any good he did in my book.

His looks, his personal life was his business, I don't care how many surgeries he had, or what he was trying to achieve with those surgeries.

People say why would someone settle out of court for the child molestation charges, its not uncommon for celebrities to do so. They want to spare their image, avoid a trial, and spare a young person from the trauma of a trial. And maybe nothing happened but they shared a bed together, but maybe his lawyers were afraid that a jury would look at that as something might have happened.

Yes people were after him for his money, but.................I have to say right now you take 2 celebrities who were acquitted for charges that they were accused of, and you have 2 different beliefs............

So people who are skeptical of Michael Jackson and see his life overshadowed by mistakes he made are worse than people who still think OJ Simpson got away with murder?

I still don't think he deserves any 'king title', I won't worship hi, I won't Idolize him, and if people want to do so, they can, but I am an individual, but from my point I see a double standard set by society.....

So what defines a 'legend'?

Because you had 2 people that did 'great' things and made mistakes, both acquitted, one is considered a legend, the other one is a 'has been'.

Mooch