So Obama released his so called birth certificate.....

I'm still not convinced he was born here, in the United States, no matter what a damn piece of paper says.

Lets look at what it took to get this piece of paper. It took states starting to pass legislation verifying natural born citizenship status. Sad that it came to this, but I think what he produced and expects us to believe is not worth much more than toilet paper.

No this has nothing to do with the color of his skin, or his religious beliefs, it has everything to do with upholding the Constitution of the United States as written by our forefathers.

If we look at different sites, you get yes its valid, and you get no its not valid, but the places claiming its not real, are breaking down the layers of the PDF file and showing WHY they believe its not real, when the other side saying its real is n ot offering proof that its real. Now on top of it all there are conflicting reports of physicians, and more and more it seems that the constitution is be written or rewritten as the case may be so that it fits the 'story', or the person.

When I searched on the web, the definition of Natural Born Citizen this is the definition I came up with:
Any human born to parents who are US citizens and are under no other jurisdiction or authority.

Can we please NOTE the word PARENTS plural.!!

If we want to know what the House of Representatives thinks, this is how The House says about natural born citizenship

The House of Representatives Definition of “Natural Born Citizen” = Born of citizen “parents” in the US.

Congress further went to say this:
“Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”

Now lets talk about the President's parents Ann Dunham and Barrack Senior. Ann Dunham was a US Citizen, however Barrack Obama Senior NEVER was a citizen. Thus at best he was born a dual citizen, being that his father was a British Citizen. If the birth certificate IS valid, it shows that he may have allegiances to other countries based on the status of his father. His father was studying at Harvard, and was told to go home and finish his degree, there was no more funding. He left the states, having never been a citizen, and could not get an extended visa.

Now we have reports of 2 birth physicians, his grandmother saying that he was born in Kenya and that she witnessed his birth, a list of long dismissed lawsuits, and records locked up tighter than Fort Knox.

I can't believe that it was Donald Trumps doing that forced the White House to release the birth certificate. I think this was more of a political move, and one that might have backfired on Obama. Obama thinks that this piece of paper will solve the dispute of his citizenship, when in fact it raised more questions than it answered. From my understanding the document that was given to everyone, A PDF, has been shown to have many layers that is not consistent with a scanned image. You have people saying yes, people saying no. But the NaySayers are the ones giving more proof that it shows inconsistencies from what it should look like.

Sure the economy is important, sure this has been a huge thorn in his side, but having waited this long to release his birth certificate raises the question of why wait so long if it were valid? Why not produce it when military personal question Obama's eligibility? A man is going to jail because he wanted proof of Obama's citizenship. Since Congress wouldn't step up to the plate and demand the proof, he sued, he defied orders. Now people are saying he belongs in prison, I am sorry I don't think he does, because in my mind and in other people's mind the issue is far from over.

Ahhh yes, the birth notice in the paper, that doesn't mean he was born in a hospital, it means the paper reported his so called birth even if moved here after he was born. So that isn't really a good argument either.

What I want to know is how come there are names that are not coinciding with the birth, such as 2 different doctors. Seems really convenient that the attending physician on the long form birth certificate is DEAD!.

In order to truly put this issue to rest, one or more people in the government need to step up and tell Obama he has got to put this issue to rest, meaning unlock his records, and prove he is who he says he is once and for all, because right now, it really appears he is hiding something. And if he can not do that, the Supreme court needs to take this case to determine his eligibility. He needs to show the people of the United States that he is the president of the United States with No allegiances to other countries.

Because right now, from what I have seen from this man his first 2 years of presidency, that he has allegiances to countries that are of Islam faith. Just by the fact he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, among many others, is question in my mind about the allegiances of the man we know as Barack Obama.

For taking my stance, now that the birth certificate has 'surfaced', I have been called a hater of Obama. No I am not a hater of Obama, if you can prove to me that the birth certificate IS in fact valid, you can explain away the words of his grandmother about him being born in Kenya, you can explain the inconsistencies on the birth certificate that make it appear to be not valid, you can explain how him having a parent that is a citizen of another country, and a citizen of the U.S, when that contradicts the definition of the House of Representatives gave, I will accept him as a Natural Born Citizen. But as it stands right now, I see him as a citizen of the United States, but the question of is he Natural Born, remains unanswered for me.

Will Arizona be the first to have a documentation law?

I have long since stopped fighting about Obama's Birth Certificate, I figure the truth will come out eventually and I watch as several states battle to get bills passed into laws to require documentation to be on a state ballot for an election.

Last night I read that Arizona is 1 vote away from being the first state to make a law to require documentation. In my honest not so humble opinion, this is a good thing, it would force candidates to provide documentation, not just some computer image jpg, that people argue whether it is shopped or not.

The law in Arizona would require that any candidate provide the documentation that people seeking, there was a bill that failed by 1 vote in January, it has now passed the senate, and is moving to the state house.

The argument by the Democrats is that states don't have the authority, the Republicans argue that states do have the authority to verify that a candidate is qualified. People are now speculating that Arizona will be the target of another lawsuit by the Department of Justice.

Someone told me that Obama was the most vetted candidate that the Democrat party ever had, however, I fail to see how he was so vetted. I mean after all, he has all of his records locked and secured more tightly than Fort Knox.

This brings into debate what qualifies as a natural citizen. Is it a person born to 2 parents that are American Citizens, is it to a person who is born in the U.S, even if the parents are not citizens. The words of the Governor of Mexico during a campaign for Obama to a group of immigrants keeps coming to mind, when this group was told not to worry 'Obama is one of us'

What if a birth certificate is not available? I mean it happens, records could be lost by the government, buildings burned, etc. The alternative documents would be a baptism certificate, a circumcision certificate, hospital birth record, or a post partum medical record.

Is Arizona as a state overstepping their bounds as far as what they can and can not do?


copyright ©2011 mari muccioli

Its not about Security its about total control by the government

As we move into a new age of government, a government that wants to control our lives, we look to the government to keep us safe.
But at was expense does this 'safety' come at. The government saying that they can do 'pat downs' and searches that go beyond reasonable search. For years we have been taught and we have taught our kids that you can not be touched in certain places except by a doctor. When we stop and look at what the Constitution of the United States says:
>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

From reports of a man telling the TSA not to touch his junk, to a man getting his urine bag broke, to children being strip searched at random, the stories of people experiencing something that goes beyond reasonable are pouring out. And we are supposed to say that this is acceptable because we were attacked on September 11, 2001? In many cases what we are seeing done is about control, more than about safety.
We were assured that images from the body scanners would not be stored, that they would be deleted. What the United States Government lied to us? These images have made their way online. If there are the 100 that are out there, how many more are there?
The government can see much more than they let you believe they can for this. The naked image body scanners border pornography. Is there any reason for TSA to stick a hand down a mans pants, to feel the front of a child? Where does the line get drawn. We know right now if the government had their way it doesn't and it won't. We are being told its for our safety. And they use the example of how bombs were tried to be gotten on board with cargo, in ink jet cartridges. The Christmas Day bomber, but what people seem to forget is that passenger did not board a plane in the United States! How can we protect what someone does over seas. Other countries are not going to scan their passengers, pat them down. Some of these countries support the demise of the United States. They laugh at what we have become, fearful. Yes they day we let terrorist dictate our lives is the day they have won. That day is here. They have won, and politicians say its to keep us safe. Just today there was an incident involving cargo at Logan Airport that prompted evacuation as a security measure. Again this is being used to say this is why we should do this, but if a dog can sniff out something in the cargo, wouldn't it be more beneficial, and less costly to use these same animals? It would certainly make the concern of inappropriate touching a moot point.
What the government is saying is that we can do this to protect you, we support this new pornography, and we support the molesting and assault of each and every person who refuses a full body scan. And as each testimony comes out from people that have been through this experience, have seen their children go through it, see it exactly as that, not at how the government is promoting it.
It's not about safety, its about control.

Amazon has finally disgusted me

For the past few years I have been an avid shopper at Amazon.com, until this year, I have been very slowly saving for an item that I want that is expensive, but today my thoughts on Amazon has changed drastically, and how they practice their business.

They hide behind saying censorship isn't their responsibility, its the responsibility and judgment of the customer to buy or not buy certain things.

What I'm talking about is the 'self published' Author, Phillip R. Greaves 2nd. That's what he goes by on Amazon, I'm not sure if that is his real name or a pen name, but his latest book has sparked an outcry from last count by CNN 2,000 Amazon users, myself one, that they would boycott the site until the book was taken down. The book's title?

The Pedeophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure.

Great Kindle reading don't you think?
Most of us think not.
While the majority of the outcry, came from parents and people who saw the book for what it was, the censorship ended with the publishing of the book. Amazon AND the author saw fit to delete comments at their will on message boards, as well as reviews. I had comments on the message board that disappeared. And I was very within the limit of Amazon's TOS on this. I didn't read any of the book, but the story has gone viral, people are canceling Amazon accounts left and right. Refusing to buy until the book is taken down. Now the book disappeared once, and then a very short time later was back up and for sale again. You can search the title and find the listing but if you click on it, it will go to a 404 page error not found on Amazon's site message.

First of all I did not read any of the e-book, but I saw several bloggers who read the free section, and while the interview CNN did said that he didn't promote intercourse with kids, but thought kissing and fondling was ok, he wrote the book to help kids who found themselves in that situation.

Right? WRONG.

The author was commenting to remarks on the message board and then deleting them, but people who saw him, saw him promoting a book about pedeophile. The book description and publishing description said that the e-book was a guide to show a humane side to pedeophiles so that if they got caught they would get a lighter sentence.

Further more on blogs, I read that he described how to make condoms for young boys. Tell me that is promoting a book for kids who find themselves in a situation? It's not, it was teaching others how to be a 'kinder' sex offender.

Amazon is clear in its Terms of Service about promoting illegal activities. This went beyond free speech and crossed into promoting illegal activity. But Amazon hid behind 'Censorship, and the author's right to free speech and freedom of the press'. I'm pretty sure that some of our founding fathers were rolling over in their graves at this one. Pretty Disgusting.

Ok, so here's even a worse case scenario. Amazon listed the book solely to make money, even knowing it was wrong to list. Which is just as bad. Their TOS says that they can pull a book at any time if they feel it violates their terms of service and with-hold any and all money due the author. So 'if', note the if', this is what Amazon did, this disgusts me just as much as what the author wrote.

Someone brought up the subject of instructional guides of how to commit suicide. Or what's the difference between what the author wrote and porn?

First of all its not illegal to commit suicide. Doctors are required by their oath to try to save you, but its not illegal to try to or to commit suicide. Simple as that.

Porn? Porn is legal, what this book was promoting was not.

There are people who said that we were over reacting, but never have I seen something go so viral so fast. People contacting the FBI about the author, contacting news outlets. Amazon knew they had to do something.

And for some scary reason, I have a feeling this isn't the last we've heard of this e-book. Fortunately there is no hardcover book to be destroyed, all shipping was done via whispernet, if it wasn't something promoting something illegal it could have been delivered regular email.

I truly hope the FBI subpoenas Amazon for records of each and every person that bought the book. When I first saw the e-book it was ranked in the 12,000 numbers. Within 2 hours of that it had jumped about 5,000 spots, by the 11pm news? The book was in the top 100 paid orders of Amazon Kindle e-books.

Of course there were those who said it was a sting to catch predators, but I truly don't believe that. This was a huge oversight by Amazon, and now they have no choice but to protect their interests. ESPECIALLY with the Christmas season just around the corner.

Me? I'll be waiting to see if the book makes a return.
Copyright ©2010 Mari Muccioli

Tax provision in the health care bill???!!! This has nothing to do with health care, and

will do nothing to stimulate the American economy. If anything this will be what sends more jobs to other countries, stimulating THEIR economy, and leaving the U.S in desperate ruins worse than Greece! Mark my words.

I read this earlier on a social networking sight, not Facebook, and confirmed it through 2 sources. CNN being one of them

http://www.naturalnews.com/028854_1099_small_business.html

http://money.cnn.com/2010/05/05/smallbusiness/1099_health_care_tax_change/index.htm

Here it is

>Section 9006 of the health care bill -- just a few lines buried in the
2,409-page document -- mandates that beginning in 2012 all companies
will have to issue 1099 tax forms not just to contract workers but to
any individual or corporation from which they buy more than $600 in
goods or services in a tax year.<

My first question is what the hell does this have to do with health care?

My 2nd question is why the hell is this in the health care bill?

My 3rd question is Does the IDIOTIC government see that this will not do anything but harm the U.S.

Over the weekend I asked if Obama was doing enough to stimulate the economy and make jobs?

Well seeing this, my answer is now a more definite NO!....

The government can't create jobs, but what they need to do is give tax breaks to people who own small businesses, or incentives through grants (government or private), make it easier to get loans for businesses, and give them incentives to keep the employment here in the U.S What a provision will do for this is send more jobs overseas, from my perspective.

Thank you Barry Soetoro, (NOT)

Thank you to these 'Representatives' (NOT) for sealing the fate of America to poverty and socialism!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/votes/house/finalhealthcare/ (this is a link to the representative list and how they voted)

Here is a link to the roll call for the senate vote

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00396

And to the morons in office that voted yea to pass it to the House? I've got more choice words for them......These incompetent morons that are supposed to represent us only represent themselves, their account, and their interests, they have no interest in anything but directing this country to socialism and bankrupting this country.

They don't give a flying fig about our 'secretive president', they don't give a rats behind about the civilian trial that found Obama 'guilty' Real trial or not a citizen can do this, and the information will be turned over to Congress and authorities, who we all know won't act or do anything....(Surprise Surprise)

I will be firing off yet another letter to my Senator, and giving her a royal piece of my mind. I'm going to flat out give her a piece of my mind. ( No I won't threaten her) but I will make it known what I think of her.

So now we have a new law going into effect, and as a 'freelance' photographer, I won't be able to buy anything over 600.00 without having to create a paper trail longer a roll of Charmin triple roll toilet paper, very likely making it impossible for me to do freelance photography.

The thinking in Washington, and I love this, I really do

>Why did these tax code revisions get included in a health-care reform
bill? Welcome to Washington. The idea seems to be that using 1099 forms
to capture unreported income will generate more government revenue and
help offset the cost of the health bill.<

Nope they won't people like me will not be able to operate or will have to shut down. People will find loop holes around the law, there are always loopholes, but will it be worth it?

In short what the government just did, in my honest not so humble opinion is seal the fate of America to be worse than what Greece is going through.

Thank you so much....

Thank you so very very much for putting the small businesses out of work and people who depend on freelance for income....thank you for caring about the economy, thank you for sending this country to socialism.

NOT!

This is just one more reason the health care bill MUST BE, not should be, MUST BE repealed.

This is just one more way to make the person more dependent on the government.

Lord Come Soon!

Why I do not support Kagan for Supreme Court

I have been doing more and more reading and some research on Obama's Supreme Court Nominee.

I've come to the conclusion that she would be a bad pick for the court, .

She has the qualifications to serve on the court, I have no problem with her qualifications.

I DO however have a problem with her thinking that the Government CAN ban books.

Here's why I disagree with this.

This goes against everything the U.S. constitution stands for. Freedom of Speech. One of the things that this country was founded on... But yet here we are saying this is wrong, or you have to print according to what we want you to read. Right now people can dissent, or agree and write just about anything.

Let me use the 'climate change' or example, and this is not to debate that subject but using it as a prime example

Right now you can get books that support climate change, or you can get books that support that the global warming climate change is a hoax, or grossly misrepresented by false data. Either way those books are available. But should censorship by the government go through I think its safe to say based on the current administration what books will be banned, and if we have a change in political party will those books become 'legal' and the opposite censored. Lots of problems here.

I know some schools have banned books from their libraries, but its not the same. And if there is required reading in class where a parent objects to a book, like Harry Potter series, there is always an alternative given.

Pamphlets printed with corporate funds should be censored? So who says what is acceptable and what is not acceptable.

And how long before this gets into our public schools and churches?

And what constitutes as material that can be banned.

She did soften her answer, but I feel she did so only to appease Justice Roberts and Scalia.

I am not thrilled with someone who thinks that they can dictate or try to tell the government what can and can not be published.

My biggest fear is that this is heading to banning Christianity as a religion. I know I'm getting ahead of the game here, but looking at the Bible and prophecies in the Bible, it will eventually become illegal to be a Christian. And a law like this would pave the way to possibly ban the Bible from Print.

Sorry but her stance that the government can ban books, doesn't sit well with me.

Another freedom being taken from us, or the government trying to take another freedom from us.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=155645

Mooch

Is Obama guilty of racial profiling himself?

These are purported to be Obama's words with Obama reading/speaking them.

"That's Just how white folks will do you. It wasn't merely the cruelty involved; I was learning black people could be mean and then some. It was a particular brand of arrogance, an obtuseness in otherswise sane people that brought forth our bitter laughter. It was as if whites didn't know they were being cruel in the first place. Or at least thought you deserving of their scorn." White folks."

This quote was taken from Dreams of my father: A story of race and inheritance A quote by Barack Obama.

I find this disturbing....and before I go on. I found this video via another gather post this morning, and I've been thinking about those 2 words all day 'White folks' How Obama has been categorizing us since his campaign trail days. White Folk.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI77cU3jsFs&feature=related

Michelle's words 'Black America will wake up'.

So the "white folks' of America that supported and voted or Obama don't count? The votes only counted if you were the Black?

Obama says that Rev Wright spoke of God and Jesus Christ whenever he was in that church, it makes me really wonder how many times that man went to church. Because from what I have heard of this man he condemned whites, he seems to have preached that the U.S. Government was responsible for the 9-11 Terrorism attacks.

Barack Obama,

What makes white people so afraid? Their demons. His words. so am I to interprit this in him saying he things white people are demonically possessed?

Rev. Wright in his first meeting with Obama said that in his first meeting that his fellow clergy felt that he and the church was to radical.

Ya think?

What kind of pastor calls from the pulpit and says for God to not bless America, but for God to Damn America? The things that were taught to Barack and his wife and very likely his kids, 'A set of Black Principles' something that the congregation had adopted back in 1979! So what he was preaching wasn't new. It was decades old! Become Soldiers for Black Freedom!

Wright claims that this country is controlled by rich white people. Yet some of Baracks most influential donors were white people!

Back in 2004 Barack started funding his campaign. He called in people like George Soros. His campaign fund raised about 2.5 million, using a millionaire exception rule.

In 2006, he met with some serious bankers and talked about his campaign. People like

Robert Wolf, and hedge fund manager Orin Kramer.

So Obama sat under the teaching of Rev. Wright which scorned at rich white folks but yet that's where SOME of Obama's money came from, rich white folks.

Obama seems to be blind that BP sent him a campaign contribution. His administration is denying it but its very easy to miss things, or to cover things up, and who knows how they donated, or what name they donated under. I don't doublt that BP gave the reported 77,051, plus donations from employees.

Reverend Wright in a sermon titled the Audacity of hope preached about 'where white folks greed runs a world in need, apartheid in on hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere. He claims that's the world.'

The more I sit here and I've watched this video in its entirety, I have to wonder, Is Obama talking about his growing up, or does he believe this is what he still faces today, in today's world.

There are a lot of questions I have now about Obama, and I have to ask right now is he racial profiling against whites? Is his influence with Rev. Wright helping him push God and Christianity out of this country. Is his attitude that the United States is at fault for past history of during WW II, is Rev. Wrights words why he continually apologizes for the 'mistakes' he believes the United States made.

Rev. Wright may not be on the Obama Staff, but how much of what Rev Wright has said in the years he and Michelle sat in his church still is with him?

I watched Obama on the Campaign trail, yet I didn't vote for him, I still wouldn't vote for him. And by no means am I a perfect person, but Obama while he is confident of himself, something doesn't sit right with me about him. His manners, his words, etc. Every time I turned around either he or someone on his campaign was pulling out the race card. If we didnt' support him we were racist. I have since come to wonder; that through all of Rev Wrights sermons and words, if Obama himself has become racist against whites. Especially those that question him, his authority, his words, his background, his history. He denounces us as terrorists, mocks us, scorns us, and laughs at us.

People tell me I've never given him a chance.

You're right, I haven't, because he's not someone I can believe in. He hasn't brought about change that many Americans expect more debt. Obama has yet to take responsibility for anything that has happened in office. Its always, and I mean ALWAYS, someone elses fault. Right down to BP. Its 20 years of previous administration Bush and Clinton's fault. Not his. Its Bush's fault the economy is so bad. Never mind that everything he has done has failed. Its Bush's fault that the bailouts didn't work. You name it, he has no blame....he sees himself as perfect, and the arrogance he carries with him, portrays it. I want to see him voted out, and badly.

Now that mid-terms are approaching, I think BOTH parties are aware with what is at stake. Their jobs. But you know these people don't have to worry about unemployment if they don't get rehired. They get lifetime pensions, and health care at the cost of the taxpayer. Every person that won in the primaries the other day, knows that they will have the fight of their life to win the trust of voters. And throughout it all the ratings of Obama have dropped. Can he win the trust of voters between now and midterms? Can he prop himself for a run in 2012? I don't know I hope not.

But the more I watch the man, I wonder if he is racial profiling against whites himself.

You want me to give Obama a chance? How about a little bit of integrity from him. Something I believe that neither he or his wife have. But then I don't think you can teach him integrity.

The integrity about his past, and unlocking his records, that would be a good start. But then wait, it would probably come out that he's not eligible to be President of the United States!

Leaving me to wonder ..................